Author Archive for Tunya Audain

“Indoctrination” Laws and Guidelines for Schools

The Gore Global Warming controversies re: truth or otherwise of his film, books, speeches, etc. has at least exposed a lot more food for thought.  To me, the most important outcome so far has been the revealing of the existence of anti-indoctrination legislation in the English School Act, 1996.  How many of our School Acts in the states, provinces, countries have similar sections, and if not, why not — given present politics in schools?

Section 406 of the Education Act says that local education authorities, school governing bodies and head teachers "shall forbid…the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school".

And if political issues are brought to the attention of pupils, the authority, the governors and the head are required by Section 407 to take "such steps as are reasonably practicable to secure that…they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views".

The High Court Judge, Mr. Justice Burton, stated that "there would have been a breach of sections 406 and 407 ….but for the bringing of these proceedings… ". He awarded two-thirds costs against the Government.  At least one can be grateful that in England there was an Act and courts to provide some remedy to the parent who brought this case forward (Mr Stewart Dimmock) however costly it was to him.  Society benefits when captive audiences of students in schools are presented balanced pictures of controversial issues.

The Judge did NOT forbid the showing of the film ( as was hoped ) but did required amended guidelines to apply:
1.  The Film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument.
2.  If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination.
3.  Nine inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.

I will try and determine how many of our 10 provinces and 3 territories in Canada have "indoctrination" laws and guidelines.
Can we try and get a world picture?

Why are Parents Excluded from Schools?

Why are Parents Excluded from Schools?

Some reasons parents are excluded from schools are:

  1. Misdirected “Professionalism” – experts know best, “Don’t teach your children, we will have to unteach them.”
  2. Concealment – having a captive audience and a monopoly provides a cover for bureaucratic excesses and little accountability
  3. Political Agendas – a) Maybe the Capitalists are preparing obedient, regimented workers for factories, or  b) Maybe the Socialists are preparing compliant social beings who depend on the collective and are peer dependent, or c) Maybe Radicals want to use schools as vehicles for various reforms: to end racism, sexism or to provide sex education, peace education…..
 Such were some reasons for parent exclusion discussed at a meeting of conservatives, April 24, 1985 in Vancouver, BC, Canada. As a long-time parent advocate, I was asked to give the lead address to start the ball rolling. Present practices plus future policy directions were discussed.

Consequences of leaving the consumer (parents) out of decision-making were serious: dissatisfied parents and public, accountability is questionable, special needs students are damaged when parents cannot advocate on their behalf. 

 Improvements could be achieved through Competition, Alternatives and Choice. School-based decision-making could be adopted as means to provide relevancy and to include parents. Reform of education finance should see the education dollar follow the student through vouchers or tax credits and paid directly to the schools, not school boards.

School systems run by the education establishment were increasingly being seen as inefficient and ineffective. The words of Milton Friedman were recalled when he described the school systems as a Tyranny of the Status Quo, run by a troika of bureaucrats, educators, and politicians.

Have things changed much in 2007, even with mandated Parent Advisory Councils in BC  public schools?

 

 

 

Effective Schools Needed to Counteract Poverty

Recently, the teachings of Ruby Payne have surfaced on how to reach the "hard-to-reach", mainly poor kids in schools.  Below is my reply to this discussion:

 

Don’t blame the family, the kids, the neighborhood, the class system…..

If we want effective schools, let’s look at the schools.

In 1978, Ron Edmonds of Harvard University Grad School of Education put the term "Effective Schools" on the map with his speech, "Some Schools Work and More Can".

"We can, whenever, and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us.
"We already know more than we need, in order to do this.
"Whether we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven’t so far.

His Checklist for Effective Schools:
1. Instructional Leadership - Principal an effective communicator, effective supervisor, the instructional leader.
2. Focused School Mission - General consensus by school community on goals, priorities, assessment, accountability. Mission statement specified and reviewed periodically.
3. Orderly Environment - Purposeful atmosphere, not oppressive, and is conducive to teaching/learning.
4. High Expectations - for students and staff. The belief is that students are capable and able to achieve: that teachers are capable and not powerless to make a difference.
5. Mastery of Basic Skills - In particular, basic reading, writing and math skills are emphasized with back-up alternatives available for students with special learning needs.
6. Frequent Monitoring of Results - Existence of a) means to monitor student progress in relationship to instructional objectives (with results easily conveyed to parents); b) means to monitor teacher effectiveness; and c) a system of monitoring school goals.
7. Meaningful Parent Involvement - Parents are kept well-informed re: programs, goals, etc. There is ample opportunity for them to keep in touch with their child’s progress. They are consulted for feedback about the school and when changes are foreseen. Parent-initiated contact with the school encouraged.
8. Avoidance of Pitfalls - Up-to-date awareness of good educational practice plus retaining currency in the field concerning promising and discredited practices. One of the cardinal characteristics of effective schools is that they are as anxious to avoid things that don’t work as they are committed to implementing things that do.

Reference: Social Policy, Mar/Ap’79, Ron Edmonds, "Some Schools Work and More Can"

Folks: That was 1978! How many casualties since? Why are we still re-inventing the wheel?

Tunya Audain

[Posted to Education Consumers Clearinghouse, Sept 17, 2007]

 

Starting a Parent Advisory Council from Scratch

Starting a Parent Advisory Council from Scratch

There is no parent group in your school and you would like to help start one? How to begin?

Of course, there are many benefits:
• parents feel welcome in their child’s school
• parents want their voice – concerns, praise, issues – to be respected and have follow-up
• families empowered through genuine involvement pass that feeling of efficacy on to their children
• and on and on….the research is heavy on benefits, to family, school and community.

Here are some of the negatives of thwarted parent involvement:
• frustrated, disenchanted, unhappy parents
• unmet student needs because advocacy on their behalf is cut-off
• poor school achievement
• and so forth….the research tells many sad tales.

So, how to begin:

1. One person can start the ball rolling….Gather a few parents and feel out the need.
Concerns might be
___ academic achievement                 ___ parents feel unwelcome
___ bullying situations                         ___ parents not involved
___ special needs students                 ___ concerns not dealt with
___ discipline: uneven, unfair, not there ___ reading problems
___ need a school handbook of policies, rules, procedures, philosophy
________________________________________________________________
2. The structure of a parent group can start out with 2 or 3 volunteers. Call yourselves the Steering Committee who agree to do the basics. Keep notes.
3. See the principal. Two (never one) make an appointment to see the principal requesting the means to set up a parent advisory council. Discuss how a school wide news item (best in the school newsletter) will issue the invitation to a meeting to form a PAC.
4. You can use carefully structured questionnaires to gather input and solicit ideas as part of ongoing discussions between schools and parents. (Example: School Checkup, Checklist for Effective Schools, Parent Satisfaction Index. See this website, under Parent Advisory Councils.)
5. Parent Rights in Education is a general guideline for parents about their role, rights, and responsibilities in education. You can modify this 20 year old flyer or pass it out to parents as is. (See this website, under Parent Rights)
6. Structure of more organized parent meetings should occur at the school at a time convenient for most parents and upon sufficient prior notice. A Chair, Vice-chair, and Secretary are the main officers you need. Class representatives are very desirable. (Do’s & Don’ts of a PAC, Levels of Parent Involvement , see this website, under Parent Advisory Councils)
7. Parent Advisory Councils should meet independently as parents, then the principal can have a set time to attend to hear concerns, praise, suggestions, whatever, or provide a report, news, etc.

Remember: In this day of the Internet it is easy to get sidetracked because there are 1,000’s of sites to visit. “Parent involvement” is one of the latest education fads, and whole industries have grown up to feed this move. But, unfortunately, much is superficial and symbolic here, as with other “reforms”. You, as parents, in your school need to keep your two eyes open:
☺ Integrity – be true to your cause
☺ Independence – don’t get sidelined into agendas of others.
You are fulfilling the most basic of human instincts: Guiding your children to independence and self fulfillment.

SCHOOL CHECKUP

SCHOOL CHECKUP

Parent Advisory Councils can use this questionnaire: a) amongst themselves, or b) as a survey of school parents as a whole. Feel free to change items as needed. The PAC can use results as a foundation for discussion with the school and/or as ideas for projects to be undertaken.

(Mark with an X or   Circle in RED what needs attention)

1. There is a handbook containing school philosophy, programs, special services, procedures for communication, etc.

2. School rules are made clear to students, staff and parents.

3. There are regular, numbered newsletters to the home with ample notice of school events.

4. Meet the Teacher Night is well-organized and effective and sets the stage for future parent-teacher conferences.

5. Parents can see their children’s files; go over the material and have questionable (damaging or irrelevant) material removed.

6. The Library is an inviting and enriching resource facility for students.

7. There is a parent group which serves in an advisory capacity to the principal.

8. School morale is high – students, parents and teachers are enthusiastic.

9. Follow-through to school work is consistent. Homework and desk work is marked, returned, corrections explained and work to be redone is checked out.

10. Student work is valued. Art, projects, accomplishments are highlighted in the school and in newsletters

11. Student absenteeism is low

12. Staff absenteeism is low.

13. Vandalism is rarely evident (no broken windows, fences, dirty environment, litter, graffiti)

14. Sensory bombardment is low –  no glaring lights, blaring PA systems, overheating and noise (contributing to hyperactivity, inattentiveness, shouting).

15. The rate of disciplinary actions is low, both within the classrooms and those handled by central office.

16. Are the washrooms dirty?

17. Is the principal rarely seen? (A good principal feels comfortable in the school, among staff, students and parents.)

18. Are lunchroom facilities noisy, messy?

19. Is communication with the school difficult…hard to get past the secretary…teachers uncommunicative?

20. Is there much theft in the school?

Do’s & Don’ts for Parent Advisory Councils

Do’s and Don’ts for Parent Advisory Councils

The most frequently asked questions from parent groups go like this: “How can we be more effective? We are fed up with doing tea and cookies, fund-raising….We want to know how to help kids in school.”

Circumstances, whether it is the parent group itself, or the principal, have cast too many groups into the “tea and cookies” image. There is now, however, a trend showing that more parent groups and principals are wanting to change that image.

If your parent group seeks to be the right-hand partner in the educational function of the school, than the first thing it should do is agree that it wants an advisory or consultative role in the school. Meaning, that the parents should be consulted before decisions are made which affect either the parents or the students.

This consultative/advisory role should be clearly understood and written down (______ Parent Advisory Council). 

 Functions can include:

-          suggestions about learning experiences

-          suggestions or changes to school policies and procedures

-          evaluating innovative programs

-          assist parents to get information about school programs and procedures

-          be informed about events affecting educational programs

-          recommend alterations and renovations

-          review curriculum

-          recommend on code of student conduct

-          help set program priorities

-          advise on means to ensure racial and cultural understanding

-          help ensure the safest possible environment for the well-being of all

 
What most parent group models fail to spell out are the pitfalls to avoid,
  1. Don’t defer to the principal. If your voice is to represent parent opinion, don’t ask the principal what he thinks, ask the parents.
  2. Don’t accept someone-else’s agenda. Stick to what the parents want on the agenda, unless there is a legitimate item brought to you for your consultation. (What color the walls should be painted is hardly an item for consultation!)
  3. Don’t think that being busy is any sign of accomplishment. Such involvement can be empty and meaningless to the quality of education at your school. Pick your targets, determine priorities.
  4. Don’t assume the parent view will automatically be listened to. Put it in writing, take minutes and have these circulated among parents and staff.
  5. Don’t hesitate to delegate jobs to sub-committees, or to refer a question for further research and recommendations. Sub-committees can greatly lessen the load and aid in good decision-making. (Sub-committees are a good place for those parents who want to be involved in fund-raising or “auxiliary” activities.)
  6. Don’t (ever) get discouraged because only a small number of parents are involved in your advisory group. Statistics show that only a small number of parents want to be involved at this level, but if this group is wise, it will not only ensure a parent voice at the school, but will also make sure that all parents do have opportunities for meaningful involvement, whatever their level of need or interest.

 Change occurs best when we question policies, behaviors, practices.  Don’t attack persons, personalities.  It’s far better to say, "I don’t think that practice is educationally sound", rather than "That teacher is incompetent."  But DO make sure your concern is passed on to the right authorities so that they can make a judgment and take corrective action if necessary.  DO be persistent in a just cause.


Levels of Parent Involvement


In his report, The Public’s Role in Education (1972), Dr. H.A.Wallin noted:

“…not all persons who seek involvement seek the same level or amount of involvement.”

He clearly discerned 4 levels: a) some just want to focus on the individual youngster in school, b) in addition, the second group is interested in some volunteer work (field trips, assisting in the library, playground, lunchroom) , c) the third group seeks more involvement with educational questions at the school, especially when innovations are concerned, and d) the fourth group feels they “have a right” to influence the kind of education children receive and seek input on goals, curriculum, instructional methods, and teacher training. Wallin said this fourth group believes:

“that it is an irresponsible society which permits, usually by default, education to be left up to the educators. It would be just as irresponsible to leave matters of defense up to the military or the nation’s health to the medical profession.”

 
 

WARNING: This next item is reprinted to show how “lightly” the subject of parent advisory groups was taken in the late 70’s. This was included in a principals’ workshop, hopefully to elicit “positive” suggestions. (Maybe, it IS a good teaching tool. What do you think?)

 

 

ADVISORY COMMITTEES

APPENDIX A
 

Eight ways to destroy an advisory group:
 

  1. Stall.  Hold the first meeting in November.  The momentum will be lost by January, and June will soon be there.
  2. Be subtly negative in your communications, always declaring willingness to co-operate.
  3. Offer no leadership.  Try to avoid an agenda for meetings and bring no ideas.  Talk endlessly.
  4. Dominate meetings.  Discourage discussion of sensitive topics.  Hide behind legalistic obstructions.
  5. Involve the group in an elaborate and lengthy report.  Then let it gather dust.
  6. If they mean business, isolate the advisory group’s leaders.  Provoke a quarrel (always in private); effectively end communication. Brand the activists as trouble-makers.
  7. Cultivate a tame group of parents.  Make it obvious that there is a split in the community.
  8. Let your staff know you are standing between them and a bunch of meddlers.  They’ll get the idea.

 

 

 

Parent Satisfaction Index

Parent Satisfaction Index                                           

Parent Advisory Councils can use this questionnaire to gather information and as a basis for seeking improvements during school discussions. Feel free to change the questions to serve your specific needs.

SA – Strongly Agree    A – Agree        N – Don’t know, not applicable     D – Disagree    SD – Strongly Disagree

 

   (First 10 items about satisfaction with school, next 10 about state of communications)

SA
A
N
D
SD
 
5
3
0
-3
-5

1. My child likes this school

 
 
 
 
 

2. He/she is getting the right programs & attention

 
 
 
 
 

3. He/she is reading at a level sufficient to keep up to class

 
 
 
 
 

4, Discipline is fair and consistent

 
 
 
 
 

5. There is good effort to help students be kind, thoughtful, co-operative

 
 
 
 
 

6. The principal knows most children & families

 
 
 
 
 

7. Most at the school act as a team, consistent on discipline, programming, school spirit

 
 
 
 
 

8. There is a sense of purpose about this school

 
 
 
 
 

9. My child feels comfortable to talk about this school

 
 
 
 
 

10.  My child will be well-prepared for the next level of education or training

 
 
 
 
 

11. The school keeps me well informed about my child’s progress or problems

 
 
 
 
 

12. Homework is relevant. I have a good idea of what is to be accomplished

 
 
 
 
 

13. The Philosophy/Mission of the school is clear to the parents

 
 
 
 
 

14. Newsletters arrive home regularly and in time to plan for school events

 
 
 
 
 

15. Newsletters are useful: describe rules, programs, holidays, events, personnel

 
 
 
 
 

16. I have been made aware of the channels to pursue if I have a problem or concern

 
 
 
 
 

17. I have good parent-teacher conferences and get to talk to teacher(s) when needed

 
 
 
 
 

18. The parent group deals with substantive matters & and is consulted by the principal

 
 
 
 
 

19. Parents can easily get in touch with the parent group and pass on concerns & interests

 
 
 
 
 

20. Invitations to attend parent meetings are genuine & held when most parents can attend

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PS:  This chart PRINTS OUT very nicely, especially if you use Landscape View in Word.

Effective Schools Checklist

Don’t blame the parents. Don’t blame the kids. Don’t blame the neighborhood.
If we want effective schools let’s look at the schools.
Ron Edmonds of Harvard who put the term “Effective Schools” on the map with his speech “Some Schools Work and more Can” in 1978 said

We can whenever, and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need, in order to do this. Whether we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven’t so far.”

It’s a scandal! Nearly 30 years later most school people don’t have an inkling about these findings, or if they do are more prone to debate or ignore the research than implement it.
Of course, this is typical because there is little up-take within a system when there is no motivation to improve (or worse still, a feeling that improvements aren’t necessary – the problems will go away).
What we need is to open up the discussions – let parents in on the scene to ensure effective schools. You can be sure, parents won’t let the matter die or gather dust for another 30 years! Resolve, commitment, the will to do things comes when there is a “dynamic” going on – when parents and educators CARE together.

We can’t let another two generations of school children slip through.  This checklist is from the 1983 archives of Education Advisory, a consumer service for parents in the 70′ & 80’s.

EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS CHECKLIST
(from the original work of Ron Edmonds, Harvard, 1978)

___ 1. Instructional Leadership Principal is an effective communicator (with staff, parents, students, school boards), an effective supervisor, & the instructional leader in the school
___ 2. Focused School Mission General consensus by the school community (staff, parents, students ) on goals, priorities, assessment, accountability. The mission statement is specified and reviewed periodically.
___ 3. Orderly Environment Purposeful atmosphere, not oppressive, and is conducive to teaching and learning.
___ 4.High Expectations Demonstrated high expectations not only for all students but for staff as well. The belief is that students are capable and able to achieve, that teachers are capable and not powerless to make a difference.
___ 5. Mastery of Basic Skills In particular, basic reading, writing and math skills are emphasized with back-up alternatives available for students with special learning needs.
___ 6. Frequent Monitoring of Results Means exist to monitor student progress in relationship to instructional objectives (and results can be easily conveyed to parents).
___ Means to monitor teacher effectiveness
___ A system of monitoring school goals
___ 7. Meaningful Parent Involvement Parents are kept well-informed re: programs, goals, etc. There is ample opportunity for them to keep in touch with their child’s progress. They are consulted for feedback about the school and when changes are foreseen Parent-initiated contact with the school is encouraged.
___* 8. Avoidance of Pitfalls Up-to-date awareness of good educational practice plus retaining currency in the field concerning promising and discredited practices.


*Most “effective schools studies” repeat the first 7 points. But, Edmonds’ original work stressed “one of the cardinal characteristics of effective schools is that they are as anxious to avoid things that don’t work as they are committed to implement things that do.”

Kozol Attacks Effective Parents

Ongoing efforts to widen parental choice in selecting schools are often met with formidable resistance. The latest is from Jonathan Kozol in August Harpers Magazine.  Please see below my Letter to the Editor protesting Kozol’s attack on vouchers and school choice.

 

 

Harpers

Dear Sir:

I was so disappointed to read the attack on effective parents by Jonathan Kozol (The Big Enchilada, Harpers, August 2007). He has worked with, and written sensitively about, families and schools for decades, yet now, in the debates about choice and vouchers, he decries the possibility of children of the ”more effective parents” getting into what he calls “boutique schools”. What if these parents are acting in the best interests of their children in seeking the best education for them–whether they are dyslexic, gifted, athletic or average?

Instead of bemoaning what effective parents can do, shouldn’t we all strive to have effective parents as the norm in our society? We should seek ways in which both parents and children can be enabled to be as effective as possible, and choosing schools which best fit educational needs is one way. In fact, choice should become family policy as a general principle.

Choicelessness, on the other hand, leads to mediocrity, inequity, hopelessness, despair, and shrinking of decision-making skills. Kozol does a grave disservice to society as a whole by disparaging effective parenting.

Sincerely

Tunya Audain, West Vancouver, Canada

Family Agencies Should Support Parents in Schools

Parents who see unresolved issues in their schools may try joining other like-minded groups to pursue concerns and issues. By joining the BC Council for the Family I met other people concerned about families and schools.

The BCCF Fall 1985 Newsletter announced the formation of the Family and Education Committee. One of the first things done was to send a letter to

Jack Heinrich, Minister of Education, giving him the background to the Council’s long-standing concern about the relationship families have with their schools. This is a concern directly expressed by many families. With the positive reply received from the Minister, in which he states he ‘would be happy to provide the support requested’ the committee hopes that they may be able to work with the Ministry of Education and be of mutual assistance.
In particular, the committee is concerned with how the family is portrayed in the curriculum and how the family is treated in home-school relationships. The committee has asked to have access to sets of materials related to the curriculum, together with descriptions of the curriculum review process and to policies and procedures regarding parental involvement.

The terms of reference for the Committee included the following:

Cognizant of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Art.26, Sec 3

Parents have a prior right to choose the kind
of education that shall be given their children.

The Committee will pursue their task, keeping in mind two fundamental principles which flow from the above declaration:

  • the right to information, and
  • the right to family privacy

The purposes of the study shall be to enquire into:

  • the influence of the public education system upon attitudes towards the family as an institution,
  • the influence of the public education system upon attitudes towards parental authority,
    1. in the home and
    2. in the child’s school concerning the child’s participation in school activities and choices among school courses,
  • the attitudes and practices of schools towards parents when they ask questions concerning their children’s courses of study, curriculum content, progress, behavior, etc.,

The terms of reference included the expectation that the committee would make recommendations concerning the need, and the ways and means, of encouraging parents everywhere to become knowledgeable about their schools and what is being taught, …

More reports on this committee in later Postings on this Site…