<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effective Schools Checklist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://education-advisory.org/Involved/2007/08/22/effective-schools-checklist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://education-advisory.org/Involved/2007/08/22/effective-schools-checklist/</link>
	<description>dedicated to parents wanting to be involved and effective in the education of their children</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tunya Audain</title>
		<link>http://education-advisory.org/Involved/2007/08/22/effective-schools-checklist/#comment-5322</link>
		<dc:creator>Tunya Audain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://education-advisory.org/Involved/2007/08/22/effective-schools-checklist/#comment-5322</guid>
		<description>Yes, your points do add to the Effective Schools Checklist.  Ron Edmonds started the ball rolling, and much advance has been made along the way. (There are many references on the Internet.) Unfortunately, the application of these approaches lags far behind the theory.  

Where is the resistance, and why?  Is it inertia -- leave well enough alone, or are employee groups actively obstructing? There are tons of books and Google (and other search engines) that point to teacher union obstructionism.

Or are consumers not well enough informed and equipped to command responsiveness and timely application of good practice?  Here in British Columbia we have had mandated parent advisory councils in the schools since 1989 but they have not had the voice required to bring things up to speed.

I see there is a growing movement called "No Excuses" and wonder how far that will go in applying Effective Schools Principles.

Evaluations and achievement scores do help in showing where schools stand as far as standards (provincial, state, federal, international, whatever) go, but do they really equip people to obtain accountability and commitment to improve?

What I do find hopeful is the new move to have value-added assessment of students and schools.  Please see the recent news report from Cleveland, Ohio.

http://www.cleveland.com/education/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/isedu/1197624649112340.xml&#038;coll=2&#038;thispage=1

This approach equips parents and teachers with a child's growth potential at the start of a period, and shows how much benefit is accrued through the school and teaching experience.

I as a parent and grandparent, aware of how very different children are, like this approach, which really brings us back to Ron Edmonds and his famous 1978 quote:

"We can whenever, and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need, in order to do this. Whether we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we havenâ€™t so far."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, your points do add to the Effective Schools Checklist.  Ron Edmonds started the ball rolling, and much advance has been made along the way. (There are many references on the Internet.) Unfortunately, the application of these approaches lags far behind the theory.  </p>
<p>Where is the resistance, and why?  Is it inertia &#8212; leave well enough alone, or are employee groups actively obstructing? There are tons of books and Google (and other search engines) that point to teacher union obstructionism.</p>
<p>Or are consumers not well enough informed and equipped to command responsiveness and timely application of good practice?  Here in British Columbia we have had mandated parent advisory councils in the schools since 1989 but they have not had the voice required to bring things up to speed.</p>
<p>I see there is a growing movement called &#8220;No Excuses&#8221; and wonder how far that will go in applying Effective Schools Principles.</p>
<p>Evaluations and achievement scores do help in showing where schools stand as far as standards (provincial, state, federal, international, whatever) go, but do they really equip people to obtain accountability and commitment to improve?</p>
<p>What I do find hopeful is the new move to have value-added assessment of students and schools.  Please see the recent news report from Cleveland, Ohio.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cleveland.com/education/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/isedu/1197624649112340.xml&#038;coll=2&#038;thispage=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.cleveland.com/education/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/isedu/1197624649112340.xml&#038;coll=2&#038;thispage=1</a></p>
<p>This approach equips parents and teachers with a child&#8217;s growth potential at the start of a period, and shows how much benefit is accrued through the school and teaching experience.</p>
<p>I as a parent and grandparent, aware of how very different children are, like this approach, which really brings us back to Ron Edmonds and his famous 1978 quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;We can whenever, and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need, in order to do this. Whether we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we havenâ€™t so far.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Butchart</title>
		<link>http://education-advisory.org/Involved/2007/08/22/effective-schools-checklist/#comment-5213</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Butchart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://education-advisory.org/Involved/2007/08/22/effective-schools-checklist/#comment-5213</guid>
		<description>Omitted from the Effective Schools Checklist of Ron Edmonds is the critical factor of Staff Development identified in "The School Makes The Difference" research authored in 1986.  Some indicators of inclusion of this factor include:
- "Inservice training is provided for teachers to improve their effectiveness.
- "Schools with strong ongoing staff development programs closely tied to the instructional program have a positive effect on student performance."
- "Teachers are seen as important resources and are encouraged to share experience and expertise."

RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omitted from the Effective Schools Checklist of Ron Edmonds is the critical factor of Staff Development identified in &#8220;The School Makes The Difference&#8221; research authored in 1986.  Some indicators of inclusion of this factor include:<br />
- &#8220;Inservice training is provided for teachers to improve their effectiveness.<br />
- &#8220;Schools with strong ongoing staff development programs closely tied to the instructional program have a positive effect on student performance.&#8221;<br />
- &#8220;Teachers are seen as important resources and are encouraged to share experience and expertise.&#8221;</p>
<p>RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
